Post-Election Negotiations

May 11, 2010

So far, I’ve resisted writing a negotiation blog on these post-election negotaitions, mainly because I find it so fascinating, I’d get so absorbed I’d end up writing a book. Can’t resist any longer, but will just cover a single point.

Negotiaiton is all about alternatives. The Lib Dems started talking with Labour to show the Tories that they had an alternative. It worked as the immediate Tory response was to up the PR (AV) offer.

What alternative do the Tories have? If they have none, they will keep giving until the cupboard is empty. Their only real alternative is for another election, either straight away or after one of the minority governments fall.

So, if they can’t do a deal with the Lib Dems, then they’ll be a new election. If there is, the electorate will not want a new stalemate, so will support the strongest party, the Tories, unless that is the Tories are seen to be blamed for the new election. This is one of the reasons they are being so nice and so generous.

If talks fail now, the Lib Dems will be blamed and will be slaughtered in the poles.

Lot’s of talk this morning on the colour of Gordon Brown’s resignation tie. Purple. Apparently, the colour adopted by the electoral reform gang. A subtle message?

Well, most of us know that Nick Clegg is half Dutch. Did you know that although they have PR, they have the same main three parties as us? For years the yellows have been able to choose blue or red. In the 90′s though the blues and reds got together and formed their own coalition. And it lasted. It was called the purple coalition. Purple, nice colour for a tie. Now if the Tories want another alternative, there’s a subtle message…

Sean Sidney, Negotiation Specialist   www.SeanSidney.co.uk


Walking the Negotiation Wire

April 30, 2010

Once a tight-rope walker has their safety net in place, they need to focus on their goal. To walk to the end of the wire. To do this they need technique and courage.

This blog follows on from the one I wrote last week. It can be read alone.

Likewise, in negotiation, you need to focus on your goal. To get the maximum price for your service. You, too, need technique and courage.

The first thing you need to do is know what the other party’s maximum price is. What will they pay for your service when pushed.

To do this, you need to understand their goals? Are they focusing on profit, turnover, growth, cash flow or innovation? Put yourself in their position. What is it that you would need? Test these assumptions, use your questioning and listening skills. Ask them about their business. Listen. Ask. Listen.

Once you know their goals, you can derive their buying needs. These might include price, quality, on-time delivery, flexibility, payment term or extra service. Make sure you are able to meet these needs better than the competition, their best alternative. If you can, you will be able to raise you price to just below the point that their best alternative becomes more attractive. If you know where this point is, you will have all the power. It is your task to find out.

It won’t be easy. Just like we will try to hide our minimum price, the customer will try to hide their maximum. If you find out what they will pay, why should we accept less?

So, a big part of the negotiation game is hiding our secret, whilst trying to discover theirs. The winner of this game will get the best deal. You can uncover theirs in three ways:

  • Market Knowledge – know their costs (unbundle) and know what their competitors charge
  • Questioning & Listening – who else are they speaking with and how keen are they on you
  • Courage – the fact that most negotiators will indicate their walk-away price by slowing down before it, then stopping at it. But you have to have the courage to push them to this price.

Sean Sidney, Negotiation Specialist

www.SeanSidney.co.uk


Negotiation Safety Net

April 19, 2010

A minimum price is to a negotiator what a safety net is to a tight-rope walker. Once in place, it must be ignored until things don’t go to plan. Focusing on it makes achieving the real goal more difficult.

That said, they both need it in place.You as a negotiator need to know how you would best meet your needs if  this particular customer walked away. You need to know your best alternative. This might be another customer, holding your resource free for another customer, spending time on the business or perhaps leisure time. You should know what the minimum is that this customer needs to offer you to make them more attractive than your other choices.

This minimum price might be, for example, £1,000 payable on ordering with low after sales service. If the customer’s “final” offer is still below this, you should walk-away and turn to your best alternative. Because this alternative will be better placed to achieve your business goals.

In the heat of the emotional battle, this minimum price will stop you accepting offers that are not good for you. And it will stop you rejecting offers that are good for you.

The tight-rope walker should focus on the goal in front of them. Yes, they sometimes avoid losing their life by having their net in the right place, but they make their living by being able to walk to the other side.

The negotiator should also focus on the goal in front of them. Yes, you sometimes avoid losing money by having your minimum price in the right place, but you make your living by getting the customer to pay their highest price.

Their highest price… now, that’s a story for next week.

Sean Sidney, Negotiation Specialist  (Sean@SeanSidney.co.uk)


What to do when your key customer demands a large price reduction?

April 12, 2010

Take the advice from the Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy and “Don’t Panic”. Although it is a  difficult position, it is far from impossible. All is definitely not lost. In fact, if you are able to answer most of the following questions with a “Yes”, you might even end up being grateful that your customer gave you this wonderful opportunity.

Firstly, have all the suppliers received this request?

Is the customer just shaking the tree to see what falls out? You can usually tell from the non specific nature of the content. Or by asking one of your customer contacts or a fellow supplier.

Are you a small supplier to them?

We know the customer is big for you, but are you big for them? As a rule of thumb, you are becoming small if you represent less than 5% of your buyer’s spend.

Ironically, the smaller you are, the more power you have. As the bigger you are, the more visible you will be. This initiative will keep your customer very busy, so the buyer will need to focus their resources where they will derive most benefit.

Can you play for time?

It is quite likely that their initiative will eventually run out of steam, as the practicalities begin to hit home. Most of the suppliers will respond in the negative or not at all. You should respond and after leaving it for a couple of weeks, do so in writing.

Your letter should not acknowledge or refer to their letter in any way. It should just be a regular customer relationship type of letter. It should emphasise the strength of the relationship and the benefits the customer is deriving from you (we’ll come back to this later).

If you are then subsequently invited to a meeting, sound keen, but subtly avoid for as long as possible.

Are you the lowest cost supplier?

Salesmen think that buyers have the easiest job in the world. They believe that buyers line up all of these poor salesmen and then beat them with a stick until only one remains standing! As an ex-buyer, all I can say is, “if only…”

That said, if what you are selling can effectively be seen as a commodity, then you deserve to be standing in that line. If your product or service can easily be replaced by a competitor’s, then to succeed you need to be the lowest cost supplier. If you are, you will be that last man standing. If not, you need to have added value.

Are you invaluable, irreplaceable?

How important to them are you?

These price reduction initiatives are very unpopular with many of the customer’s department heads. So, are these influential stakeholders reliant on you? How much do they need you? Are you, for example, involved in any co-development? A key question here is, is the customer selling to its customers only on price, or also on quality, reliability, flexibility, branding, speed to market, innovation, etc? If one of the latter, are you supporting them with this? If so, the stakeholders’ own objectives will be threatened if valued suppliers like you are kicked out.

How much choice do they have?

How many suitable suppliers are there out there to replace you? How complex/unique is what you do? Are the customer’s requirements/specifications industry standard or based on yours? Will a significant investment be required by the incoming supplier? Does the customer have sufficient expertise to identify alternative suppliers?

How easy is it to introduce a new supplier?

How difficult will a transition be? This will of course affect their cost/benefit analysis. How long will a full transition take and how much risk is involved? How much information is required to manage this change and how much of this is actually held by you? Is the supply chain long or complex? Does the customer have a complex supplier approval process? Changes will require organisational support. Do they have the required resources?

Have you convinced your customer that you are invaluable, irreplaceable?

As perception is reality, you need to get your selling hat back on. And it should be much easier to sell this time round.

Selling is about identifying needs, then showing benefit. As this is your key customer you should know their needs by now. But have you shown benefit? At this point, you should do this in two ways.

Firstly speak with all the customer’s (non-purchasing) people you know. Pump them for information, remind them how they individually benefit from the relationship (embellished pick ‘n’ mix from the previous section), tell them it looks like you’re going to be kicked out of the business and state that you’d love to reduce your price, blah, blah, but are already offering your lowest price. Objective is to get these stakeholders selling for you, which will hopefully stir things up a little. This is called “back- door” selling and it is every purchaser’s nightmare.

Secondly, write to the buyer.  As mentioned before, your letter should not acknowledge or refer to their letter in any way. It should just be a regular customer relationship type of letter. You should emphasise the strength of the relationship and the benefits the customer is deriving from you (again, embellished pick ‘n’ mix).

When you speak to customer’s people and write to the buyer, emphasise the points where you know you are strong relative to the competition. This helps condition them regarding selection criteria in case there is a future tender process.

Can you afford to lose this customer?

You need to know whether you can find other customers for their orders. Do you in fact just have a lazy dependency on them? How much margin are you making from them? Do they offer you other benefits, such as an association with a high profile name; good publicity; opportunity to grow; access to knowledge; strategic fit to your business; etc. These would all make the relationship more valuable to you. If this is after all such a crucial customer to you, you should secure a long term contract, which is discussed below.

Other than price, are there other important things you want from this relationship?

If there are, would you exchange them for a limited price reduction? Well, now is the time to ask for them! As this letter has gone out, you can safely assume that the buyer is going to be measured on their short-term savings. As very little else has value for them, they’ll gladly give stuff away to achieve these short-term savings. So, get bargaining. ”If you can do this, this and this, then we could possibly reduce our price by 3%”. The only question is, what is it that you want from them? Long term contract (as mentioned above), shorter payment terms, marketing benefits, less frequent orders or deliveries, more regular orders, longer lead times, more accurate forecasting. The choice is yours…

Would you benefit from sending a similar letter to any of your suppliers?

Don’t make the same mistake of carpet bombing your suppliers. So, which ones? Easy! Choose the suppliers who would answer “No” to most of the previous questions! And drop the line in “our key customers are demanding large price reductions…”. Though forget to mention that you not going to give them one.

Lastly, are you brave enough to go back to your customer with a price increase?

Justify with a change in product/service offering, that was either necessary or preferably beneficial to them.

Though, it might be wise to leave it a few months…

And!

If you have yet to receive such a request, are you ready for one? For all your key customers, make sure you can answer most of these questions with a “Yes”. If not, feel free to contact me to see if you need some assistance.

Sean Sidney, Negotiation Specialist  (Sean@SeanSidney.co.uk)


David Villa to Manchester United?

April 10, 2010

David Villa is one of the very best strikers in the world. He plays for Valencia and wants to leave at the end of the season. Even though he is contracted for another 4 years, it is generally accepted that he will leave.

In theory, Valencia don’t have to sell him, but want the very large transfer fee that all the top clubs competing for him will generate. They want a bidding war and to sell to the highest bidder. It seems Valencia have all the power. But wait.

David Villa doesn’t have to join the club which submitted the highest bid. He can refuse and stay at Valencia. The club don’t want this as they fear he’ll become demotivated and potentially disruptive. So, Villa too has power.

Enter Manchester United. They have a chance of securing most of the power.

First, they must understand their own needs. They want a top centre forward to play up front with Rooney, but don’t want to pay £50m for him.

Next they must understand Villa’s needs. He wants a top salary, yes, but mostly he wants silverware, to play for a top name and a new challenge. This challenge seems to be playing in England. He is learning English and has discussed it with Torres, his compatriot at Liverpool.  The name apparently is not Chelsea or Manchester City. And the silverware (and the price) rule Liverpool and Arsenal out. He apparently has signalled his desire to join United.

And lastly, United need to persuade Valencia to accept less than the £35-40m they have said they expect. They’ve started trying to convince Valencia that they can’t and won’t pay that much. The most read article in the Guardian in the last 24 hours is “Manchester United spark new cash fears with no to £40m David Villa”. The article also reaffirms United’s policy of not spending large sums on players who are 26 or above. Villa is 28.

An early goal for Man United. To equalise, Valencia need to persuade another club to make a large bid for Villa in order to make United believe Valencia will risk not selling him. Then to score the winner, Valencia will need to persuade that club to offer Villa a package he can’t refuse.

Sean Sidney, Negotiation Specialist  (www.SeanSidney.co.uk)


When buying, begin with price

April 9, 2010

Whatever you are buying, begin with discussing the price. This makes the seller believe that your needs are easily met and therefore you have plenty of choice.

If you have more demanding needs, such as a short lead time, high quality, bespoke design, etc. then the supplier will know that competition is limited. They know if they can meet your requirements, they will have a good chance to win the order, irrespective of price. As you would expect, they will therefore quote a high price.

You should manage this in three ways:

One, try to minimise your requirements. What can you do to reduce your needs to industry norm levels?

Two, search higher and wider and longer for qualifying suppliers.

Three, begin with price. Ask a price for the basic product/service. The supplier will then give you a competitive price, as they think they are competing with numerous other suppliers. Then add your higher demands. Yes, this will push the price up, but they will have to justify the increase. Their ability to premium price is greatly diminished.

Be warned, the supplier will try to put off giving a price until they know whether they can premium price. Be strong, you are the customer. You are king.

Sean Sidney, Negotiation Specialist  www.SeanSidney.co.uk


Your Negotiation Style

March 27, 2010

A negotiation is a process where we try to persuade others to move towards our position. To encourage this movement, you can employ five different styles. These are logic, emotion, threats, compromise and bartering.

But are you using the right ones at the right time? Have you got the balance right?

If you would like to discover then improve your own personal negotiation profile, drop me a line (Sean@SeanSidney.co.uk). It is easy and fun. And will immediatley empower you to negotiate more succesfully.

Sean Sidney, Negotiation Specialist (www.SeanSidney.co.uk)


How to Charge what you are Worth

March 23, 2010

This is a guest blog I wrote for www.justpracticing.com, a very popular blog with architects. The ideas in this article can be transferred to most service offerings.

Most of you charge according to your costs. Charging what you are worth to you. That keeps you in your comfort zone, but it is not how successful businesses charge. Apple, Nike, Unilever, Tesco, etc. all charge what they are worth to their customers.

This article is about showing you how to charge what you are worth to your client. You will need to do two things; make the client want your service, then make them pay their top price.

1.  Make them want your service

This is selling. You might not believe it, but you are probably good at selling. Well, at least the main bit about understanding what your client wants and putting a proposal together in line with that. The bits you probably find daunting are pricing and closing (which we’ll come back to).

To understand needs you have to know your client’s business, so question and listen well. I know very little about your business, except that your clients’ needs will be more complex than just cost. On most occasions, they’ll include variations of quality, innovation, time to completion, on-time delivery, flexibility or cash flow.

If these needs aren’t present, then you have no chance to add value. In the short-term you will only be able to compete on price, which means in the long-term you can only survive by managing out cost (probably reducing your salary/dividend).

So, think with your client. Think for them. Ensure your proposal focuses on what is important to them. For example, if cash flow is their concern, construct a deal where you get paid when they do. If it is time to completion, guarantee the completion of the time critical work within so many days of the handshake.

Ensure the client realises that the success of their project depends on your contribution.

2.  Make them pay their top price

Great, they want your solution. Though, you’ve yet to talk about price. If they have asked you, you would have avoided giving a price by explaining that you can’t until you know what they want. The real reason is because you first need to know how much they are willing to pay!

The price they pay will depend on:

(a)    The choices they have. The less complex their needs, the easier it will be for them to create choice. Are they talking to other architects?

(b)   How much they think you will accept. Why would your client pay £10,100, when they think you’ll accept £10,000? So, hide this fact, be very aware of the signals you give off. Also, make it difficult for them to break down and compare your costs. Always quote for a completed service, if your quote includes hours or day rates, these might be challenged. If they survive this challenge, then they are too low!

You are now about to talk price. To do this, ask them again whether they are happy with the proposal. Then re-state your proposal, emphasising the key benefits. Finally, introduce the price, saying “we can do all that for you for X.”

But go for a high price. They’ll probably pay it, especially if cost is not the key driver, you nailed the proposal and they have no idea that you would accept less. Be courageous.  Just go for it. And be reassured, it gets easier every time…

Now for the final close, “would you like to place the order?” “If not, what is stopping you?” “So, if we resolve that, would you be ready to place the order?”

They may very well try to negotiate the price down. Hold your nerve. Re-sell the benefits. Be friendly and understanding, but say sorry and emphasise the work involved and that your offer is market competitive. Then re-sell the benefits, again. Pause and keep pausing and see what happens.

If they continue on price, ask them, “other than price, have you got any issues with the proposal?” If you think that they really do need something from you, go on give them something (you should now have plenty to give!). This will seal the deal and help them go away with a positive feeling.

So, if you want to transform your practice from a busy one into a highly profitable one, then start charging what you are worth…

Sean Sidney, Negotiation Specialist

www.SeanSidney.co.uk


March 12, 2010

Negotiating the best price for your house

Selling your house is one of the most important financial transactions of your life. If you negotiate well, you could gain more than half a year’s income. Estate agents won’t help you, they are looking to persuade both parties to accept a reasonable price, not to push the buyer to their limit.

When you have marketed and presented your house well, a buyer will make an offer, which will probably be some way below the asking price.

Can this buyer actually afford the asking price? Probably yes. Your agent should know this (they can ask the buyer about budgets, mortgage approvals and price range of houses they’re looking at).

Do they want it enough to pay the asking price? Again, probably yes. If they’re bidding on your house, they have chosen it, they love your house enough to live there. Price then becomes less important.

Can you convince the buyer to pay the full asking price? Probably yes, if you can employ four tactics: (i) avoid letting your estate agent suspect you will accept anything less. (ii) keep repeating why you think the house is worth the money. (iii) hold your nerve, resist lowering your price. (iv) make sure the buyer likes you.

If the buyer walks away, leave it a couple of days, then ring them and say, for example, that you have persuaded your spouse to accept a lower offer.

When you think the buyer will not move anymore, suggest a compromise. As a bonus, this will give the buyer a good feeling, reducing the chance of them pulling out before completion.

Allowing for the risk, go and have fun and get the best price for your house.

Sean Sidney www.SeanSidney.co.uk


Saving Face

January 7, 2010

Losing face is something humans instinctively avoid.

Once someone has taken a strong position in a negotiation, unilaterally moving from it requires them conceding that they were wrong to take that position. Moving from it substantially means losing face.

You have done the hard work and convinced them that to get a deal at all, they need to move a lot. Problem is that they won’t move as they don’t want to lose face. Or if they do agree, they’ll get you back afterwards. What to do?

Easy. Just help them.

If their offer is stuck on 100, but you believe they can move to 80, ask them what changes they need to make for the price to be 80. Negotiate to ensure these changes, although grand sounding, are insignificant to you.

Deal done, face saved.

See this excellent (and funny) example of how to try it with your dentist: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3AUjQaOuiKA


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.